A TV presenter won a high-profile Upper Tribunal case regarding her employment status under the IR35 rules. HMRC appealed against this, but the Court of Appeal has just rejected its argument. What happened?
HMRC’s argument was that the Upper Tribunal had interpreted a key piece of case law incorrectly. The case in question sets out the factors that should be considered, such as mutuality of obligation, personal service and others. HMRC argued that whether someone is “in business on their own account” (i.e. other factors) should be given little weight, and even argued that considering this would be an onerous compliance burden for HMRC. In a decision published today, the Court of Appeal unanimously rejected this argument, stating that circumstances known to both parties at the date of the contract, e.g. the fact that the person providing the work has an established career as a freelance worker, should be taken into account. This is a huge win for all contractors, particularly those providing personal services.
The decision on whether, overall, there would have existed an employment relationship in this case was remitted back to the Upper Tribunal.
This article has been reproduced by kind permission of Indicator – FL Memo Ltd. For details of their tax-saving products please visit www.indicator-flm.co.uk or call 01233 653500.